Photo: Marc Chagall - (War -1966). The massacre of the village without any opposition. The little people of the mountain, without defending had been massacred, involving the same children, to honour the principle of non-violence. The Non-defence of children, defenceless is idolatry to a principle sacrificing the community and children themselves (symbolism of the sacrificial goat on the bottom that watches the massacre of villagers with startled look).

I want to evoke the historical personality of Gandhi, so similar to that of Jesus; you should not forget what he actually taught, not what they would make him to say.

In his diary, “old as mountains: the truth and non-violence,” he says, “if I had to choose between armed struggle and cowardice, the truth teaches me to choose armed struggle; but just because I'm a follower of truth, the truth, when there is no cowardice and there is awareness and courage, teach me the path of non-violence”.

In the same spirit, when he was reported that a small population without defending had been massacred, involving the same children, to honour the principle of non-violence; Gandhi regretted the false and erroneous interpretation of this principle, saying that non-violence was a free choice and not a reasoned position taken arbitrary, it is the best method of fighting under condition of maturity and awareness, a risk accepted with courage, but one could not oblige the children, the weak and the helpless and all those, who had no opportunity to choose to be involved in the ultimate sacrifice that went beyond self-defence.

Children were not supposed to experience violence, being defensible, in love of the principle of ”non-violence" professed by the fathers.

In this way, the little ones, the weak, defenceless, the old one would have suffered violence, “not doing violence to violent", which would not have been certain be the principle of, which would have been even more destructive in the same “force" that would exert on the transgressors, as non violence responds to rationality, to truth, that is at the service of love respecting the weaker, friend or foe, and it is not idolatry to a principle that sacrificing the community and kids and themselves.

Nous utiliserons le prophétisme moderne pour combattre, avec des mots clairs de paix, contre les maîtres de guerre, qui profitent des personnes trompées privées de valeurs vraies telles que le respect de la vie, les opinions des autres, pour la terre et la propriété des autres . Le prophétisme moderne circule sur le réseau, puisque le réseau fournit un pont (symbolisme au trapèze). Tous les prophètes de l'égalité et de la paix agissent comme des «poissons» qui, une fois laissés dans leur flux de vie, sont magnifiques et vivants. Image: Marc Chagall; Le cirque bleu 1950 - 1952. Un trapèze de cirque, qui relie deux extrémités (comme un pont), mais est aussi l'instrument avec lequel les trapèzes s'expriment, nageant comme des poissons dans le ruisseau.

Le prophétisme moderne circule sur le réseau, puisque le réseau fournit un pont, comme en témoigne un prophète moderne, le pape Francis, le chef de l'Église catholique.

En fait, il utilise ses mots: "Nous sommes en guerre, mais ce n'est pas une guerre de religion";

Eh bien, je pense que "dans une société où la guerre n'apporte aucun retour et tout le monde - dans chaque classe sociale - ne fait qu'une perte énorme, il n'y aura pas de guerre".

Par conséquent, nous utiliserons le prophétisme moderne pour lutter, avec des mots clairs de paix, contre les maîtres de guerre, qui profitent des personnes trompées privées de vraies valeurs telles que:

- Respect de la vie,
- Respect des idéologies des autres,
- Respect du territoire,
- Respect de la propriété des autres.